Posts Tagged ‘michael geist’

Canada’s Copyright Consultation

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

Speak Out On Copyright

UPDATE: As mentioned in the earlier version of this blog post, Michael Geist will launch has launched the Speak Out On Copyright website and you should go there now.

I’ve been bleating for some time now about how the Harper government was trying to jam through Bill C-61 in the hopes of looking good in that particular shade of brown lipstick the U.S. media lobby loves so well, and how in the well-intentioned but malignantly misguided efforts to reform copyright law in Canada the people most affected by these changes – the people of the country – were not consulted.

Let's tell 'em what we REALLY think!

Here’s your chance.

Michael Geist reports on the launching of the Copyright Consultation Website where you – and everyone you encourage to go there – can let the government know exactly what you feel and think about copyright law and how it affects you, this country and the world.

As Geist himself says in a previous post:

There has been some criticism over the past week about perceived “A” lists for those invited to roundtables and those excluded. My view is that the only list that really matters is the list of people who take the time to make a public submission. That process is open to everyone and this is the ideal opportunity to ensure that Canadians voices are heard. The government has not consulted on copyright since 2001 and this consultation represents both a crucial opportunity and a potential threat. While Canadians can ensure that the government understands that copyright matters and that a balance is needed, some groups will undoubtedly use the consultation to push for a return of Bill C-61. Indeed, the recording industry has already said that that bill did not go far enough. That means we could see pressure for a Canadian DMCA, a three-strikes and you’re out process, and the extension of the term of copyright to eat into the public domain.

Countering those calls will require broad participation. To help foster that participation, tomorrow I will be launching a new website geared specifically to the copyright consultation along with my short form response to these questions. I plan to blog a long form response throughout the summer.

Geist will soon have his own site up to help organize voices that can speak just as loudly as the favoured elite who get to sit in on the roundtable discussions and twist the government’s ear. This is important shit that will affect everything from the public domain, the DMCA, that fucking ACTA bullshit, Net Neutrality, Freedom Of Speech, government transparency, open culture and more.

I’ll be sure to holler about it when the other site comes online.

In the meantime visit the consultation site – tell your friends – talk about it – think about it and be sure to give Geist’s latest post a read since it really distills the issues to the core points that will affect everything we will do for the rest of our lives.

Everything? Really? Isn’t that a bit of an exaggeration? Indulging in hyperbole, perhaps? Not when you give it even just a moments thought.

Here’s Geist’s thoughts on Why Does Copyright Matter?

For me, copyright matters because I am a professor and my students need access to copyrighted materials and the freedom to use those materials. It matters because I am a researcher who needs assurance that as materials are archived they will not be locked down under digital rights management. It matters because I am deeply concerned about privacy and fear that DRM could be harmful to my personal privacy. It matters because I have created videos and need flexibility in the law to allow for remix and transformed works and do not want my content taken down from the Internet based on unproven claims. It matters because I am a writer and I need certainty of access to speak freely. It matters because I am a consumer of digital entertainment and I want the law to reasonably reflect the right to view the content on the device of my choice. It matters because I am a parent whose children have only known life with the Internet and I want to ensure that they experience all the digital world has to offer. It matters because I live in a city with a strong connection to the digital economy and we need forward-looking laws to allow the next generation of companies to thrive. It matters because I am a proud Canadian who wants laws based not on external political pressure, but rather on the best interest of millions of Canadians.

So think about it. Read about it. Talk about it. Visit the site(s).

And then speak up.

Cheers.

P. S. Muchos gracias to Jimmy Kayak (aka Jim Taylor) for his shout out about this post and the issue at large. Thanks, man!

CRTC Hearings On Net Neutrality Begin

Monday, July 6th, 2009

Michael Geist reports on the CRTC’s network management hearings which begin this week.

good_dog_bandwidth1

Geist has always been great at pointing out the inconsistencies in the arguments of the telecoms and cable companies who have already proven they will say anything to retain what they believe is their rightful control and ownership of the internet.

This from Geist’s post:

The telecom and cable companies will likely maintain that managing their networks, which may include using “deep packet inspection” to identify subscriber activity and limiting available bandwidth for certain applications (a practice known as throttling), is essential to ensure optimal access for all subscribers. Consumer associations, independent Internet service providers (ISPs), broadcasters, creator groups, and technology companies are likely to warn against network management practices that raise competition, privacy, and consumer rights concerns.

My weekly technology law column (Toronto Star version, homepage version) notes that as the Commission weighs the various claims, it would do well to consider the testimony it heard just a few months ago during the February new media hearings. The issue at play at those hearings was whether ISPs should face a levy to fund new media or be required to prioritize Canadian content (the CRTC declined to do both in its decision released last month). Interestingly, the same telecom and cable companies that will now argue that managing their networks is essential, offered a somewhat different take when confronted with the prospect of doing so in the name of supporting Canadian content.


Everyone should keep an eye on Geist’s continuing reportage on these hearings as they will directly affect the future of our internet use – indeed, of the internet itself – not just here in Canada but with subsequent reverberations beyond our borders.

I told you never to call me here.

Net Neutrality equals Free Speech.

Pass it on.

Cheers.

A Decade Of Downloading

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

Michael Geist appeared on TV Ontario’s The Agenda last week, along with Bob Wiseman (formerly of Blue Rodeo), Matt Hartley of the Globe and Mail, Grant Dexter of MapleMusic, and Andy Maize of the Skydiggers and MapleMusic.

It’s a great discussion about the changes in culture and business wrought by digital downloading of music (in particular but other media by inference) with the clear emphasis being on how any business has to attend to the needs and desires of the consumers citizens who buy the products and services being offered for sale.

While the big attention being paid to the disruptive effects of digital media, commerce and accessibility invariably focuses on the music, film and television industries we can clearly see a rising tide of resonant effect in other industries as citizens become used to and insist upon having the ability to speak loudly and clearly about what they want and don’t want. This ripple-to-tsunami effect on the culture will touch more than industry, reaching deep into the processes of governance, law and how we share this planet with each other.

I’ve often been accused of being naive whenever I look past the current state of things and attempt to get a glimpse of the further consequences which await us. Naiveté connotes ignorance and while I might sometimes be admittedly dirt stupid about many things I’d like to believe I am far from ignorant. There’s a difference between naive and hopeful; and I am hopeful for what lies in store for us as we continue to embrace and use these new tools, these new extensions of our senses. It harkens back to Stewart Brand‘s arguably hubric “We are as gods … “ statement in the opening pages of 1969′s The Whole Earth Catalog:

We are as gods and might as well get good at it. So far, remotely done power and glory — as via government, big business, formal education, church — has succeeded to the point where gross defects obscure actual gains. In response to this dilemma and to these gains a realm of intimate, personal power is developing — power of the individual to conduct his own education, find his own inspiration, shape his own environment, and share his adventure with whoever is interested.

That’s not naive and it sure as shit is more than just being hopeful. It is a declaration of intent and one we would all do well to remember and embrace. The arguments of today in response to how our past is being changed before our eyes is, at best, a mildly interesting discourse.

The better conversation is: What do we do next?

Cheers.

P. S. And as we accelerate on our journey into the future-now we must still contend with the heavy clay-laden feet of the dying dinosaurs as they waddle behind us and eagerly copy each others lies to justify their indolence and greed.