Stephen Fry On Broadcasting
Stephen Fry recently gave a speech on behalf of the BBC and he has reproduced it for his podcast as Episode 4: Broadcasting.
You should listen to it for a number of reasons: Stehen Fry is a wonderful speaker and writer, he is an admiringly geeked out technophile and he is probably one of the more brilliant human beings on the planet. And he can crack a good joke now and then. Give it a listen.
The Globe and Mail this weekend published a piece by Jennifer Wells on the head of the CBC, Richard Stursberg, in an attempt to discern if his intentions for the CBC are fair or foul.
My own opinion of Mr. Stursberg is well known - I consider him to be a pompous self-serving corporate weasel with all the management flair of a sack of fertilizer. Having said that I also think he would benefit from listening to Mr. Fry’s words. Not that Stursberg (note how I have now dropped the “Mr.”) will ever change - he is a product of the MBA dementia which has seized our times and is determined to drag us all down with them to their well-organized hell - even it destroys our culture, our lives and our entire world in the process. But perhaps - just perhaps - it might cause him to reconsider the current spate of heinous actions which have taken place at the CBC under his guidance. Not a very likely occurrence, I grant you, but one must never give up hope.
Reading the article on Stursberg (and digging a little deeper into his character - which doesn’t take long since it’s a rather shallow journey) and then listening to Stephen Fry speak about the same issues which have been bedeviling the BBC it quickly becomes clear what the differences between the two really are:
Richard Stursberg is an ignorant toad and a disingenuous hypocrite of the most loathsome sort.
Mister Stephen Fry, on the other hand, is someone to be inspired by and to be listened to.
I could go on and perhaps should in order to better define my argument but I’m just so furious at Dickturd Stursberg I refuse to waste any more time on him today and will instead sit in my backyard and make plans for moving to Norwich or some other such place which I understand are lovely at any time of year. I won’t actually move, of course. Even though my family comes from England I have been far enough removed from that septic sceptered isle long enough to understand why my forebears crossed an ocean to get away.
But we still share much as a cultures - and we would both benefit from watching how both sides of the same arguments get played out in this coming year. Maybe during that time we’ll finally get some answers as to why the Harper government is choosing to ignore the recent Heritage Committee Report on the CBC and is instead pursuing a policy entirely antithetical to the reports conclusions, choosing to pursue a “business” model for Canada’s public broadcaster which fits nicely with Turdsberg’s and will result in the inevitable and inexorable dismantling of the CBC.
Did I neglect to mention I perceive Richard Stursberg as a deranged, diseased and festering genital blight upon our nation?
Just checking.
Cheers.
Posted: 3:39 pm Saturday, June 28th, 2008 under Uncategorized.
Comments: 4
Comments
Comment from Ether Mertz
Time: June 30, 2008, 12:50 pm
Millz, no one can spew invective like you. It would have been cool if you had outlined just a teensy morsel of the differences in views so the reader would know what you were ranting on about. As always an entertaining romp. Oh, I would have just called him “Turdsberg” from the get go and left it at that. That’s just me, style thing.
Comment from Robbo
Time: June 30, 2008, 3:02 pm
Yeah, thanks - I get lazy and figure if anyone is actually reading my shit they must already have at least a bare minimum clue as to what I’m yammering on about. Of course, the basic rules of any form of journalism require a modicum of actual information be delivered. Yer right.
I also assume that people will actually go and listen to Fry - you didn’t do that did you? Now who’s lazy? I also assumed people would go and read the Globe article to get the Stursberg position - you didn’t do that either did you? No. You lazy fuck.
And for the record I don’t respond to all my commenters this way - only the ones I’ve known for 40 years.
Cheers.
Comment from Philip Elliott
Time: June 30, 2008, 4:32 pm
Where on Earth did they get this person at CBC??
He totally infuriates me as to what he is doing to our once great national network, especially CBC Radio 2. Had it not been for CBC Radio 2 30 odd years ago, I would not have developed the interest I have in Classical music now.
I expect that as of Labour Day, I’ll be looking for a larger hard drive & loading up my over 1100 Classical cd’s on it.
As for TV, that’s another story & won’t even go there.
It truly amazes me as to how CBC, thanks to you-know-who cares little about what it’s tax paying public think!!!
Comment from Robbo
Time: June 30, 2008, 8:30 pm
As much as I love to rant and rave about Stursberg it must be remembered that others were responsible for hiring him.
Robert Rabinovitch is to blame for Stursberg’s excessive lack of imagination and misguided managerial shit dance - just as those whom Stursberg hires are equally responsible for carrying out his fetid vision of what a public broadcaster should be - I’m talking about you and your cohorts, Mr. Fred Fuchs.
Ultimately it is the entire Board of Directors of the CBC who are to blame for the well trodden path to the cultural manure heap which we are being led down. They alone hold in their hands the power to realign our much maligned institution. But they too dance at the behest of their own bosses - and that would be our government - who themselves have been corrupted by corporate media and blinded to the obvious and made deaf to the cries of the people they purport to represent.
They’re all a fat load of scum suckers who deserve nothing less than to have their bare asses nailed to the roof of Parliament - on prime time - now THAT would give ‘em good ratings.
Cheers.



Write a comment